N.B. I'm half Minnesotan and spent 4 years in the Midwest at college (M Blo Gue!), so I know something of which I speak.
Okay, back on topic...Representative Steve "Chicken à la" King (R-Iowa) has based his entire political career on bringing out the surprise in our national noodle zeitgeist. The New York Times recently published an interview with him, in which he wrapped himself in the bloody flag of white angst and victimhood to bemoan how the language of hatred and exclusion had "suddenly" become so unfashionable and verboten in public discourse. Clearly, this same language caused involuntary urinary discharge in their lower haberdashery of many members of the GOP leadership, causing many of them to go onto the airwaves, furrow their brows, and speak very sternly about how King's pronouncements had no place in their party's vision for this nation.
Really?
Mind you, they have no problem whatsoever with actual substantive policy objectives that this language would promote and defend. This is a blog and not a historical essay, so I won't be able to provide the exhaustive account of the GOP's efforts to rollback the civil rights and other social reforms that were initiated in the 1950s and 1960s even before the ink on them had begun to dry. Suffice it to say that the Richard M. Nixon's Southern strategy was the beginning of the political legitimization or normalization of white supremacy. Before politicians and garden variety yahoos had no need for such niceties as nuanced political strategies and messaging. They simply strung the dad gum (censored) up and had themselves a good ol' lynchin'.
Now lest folks think, "There he goes again, bashing the GOP." Let's also remember a few important facts. The Southern strategy was a response to the legislative juggernaut that was Lyndon Baines Johnson. He both destroyed the Dixiecrat-dominated Democratic Party and re-created it into one that stood for prosperity for all, racial equality, and protection of the most vulnerable with greater access to better quality public services. However, it wasn't long before his successors in the Democratic Party leadership, after getting smacked in the mouth a few too many times at the ballot box, began to adopt a "Lite" version of the GOP's strategy, all to win back the Reagan Democrats.
They gave us Slick Willy Clinton's "Ending Welfare as We Know It," Hilary Clinton's law 'n' order dog whistle about "Superpredators," and Obama's tough guy "Deporter-in-Chief" shtick, all to prove that they could outdo the GOP in appealing to whites' anxiety about losing their status in our increasingly racially diverse society. At the same time, the Democratic Party began to rely more on corporate donors and less on its union and other movement-based allies for campaign support and policy ideas. Indeed, if you follow the money ("He who pays the piper...), it's been pretty difficult to distinguish between the two parties with the main difference being the Democrats' capability to speak out of both sides of their mouths: reassurances to military and corporate elite that they would maintain an unjust, militaristic status quo while weeping crocodile tears to the masses about feeling their pain.
Anyway, back to Congressman Noodle Head, his biggest mistake was to rip off the frayed smiley face sticker that the GOP (and many in the Democratic Party) have slapped onto their sordid policy agenda of white supremacy and ever-greater economic inequality. I guess he crossed a line and, as a result, is no longer considered useful by his party's leadership. He'll have to content himself with eating a casserole of his own making: crow.
No comments:
Post a Comment